[Date Prev] [Date Next] [By Date] [By Thread] [Top]
- - E-Mail for All - - - EMFA-EVENT - - - Universal Access - - Theme: Universal E-mail - Essay 1 Author: Shabbir J. Safdar E-mail: shabbir@mindshare.net [Shabbir J. Safdar is a new media political strategist and co-founder of mindshare Internet Campaigns, LLC in Washington, DC. Previously he founded the Voters Telecommunications Watch, a grassroots Internet advocacy group in New York City.] INTRODUCTION When I was initially approached to sit on the Advisory Board of the Markle Foundation's Email for All campaign I was elated. Having always been at heart an email-based activist (I started the Voters Telecommunications Watch (http://www.vtw.org/) before the Web hit), I was thrilled that Markle realized that email is the "killer app". One of my original in-kind donors, Public Access Networks in New York City, understood this and had long had a policy to provide very low-cost, no-frills Internet accounts whose main attraction was an email address. But the campaign also posed an interesting dilemma. If you strip away the issues of universal Internet access and telephone service and assume the focus of the campaign is just to ensure everyone has email once they have net access, the problem appears to be solved. This shouldn't be taken to diminish the importance of Universal Service and the dilemna of the fact that tens of millions of Americans still don't have simple dialup Internet accounts, or the luxury of the funds to even pay for even increasingly cheap computers. But to a certain extent, the narrow focus of this campaign seems to be about continuing these free services, not creating them. FREE EMAIL SYSTEMS ARE HERE AND AMAZING Email wasn't always so available. Any historian of public internet usage from before the web remembers the burden of libraries and freenets who had to contend with the technical infrastructure issues associated with providing email access. More than a few librarians approached me at conferences asking me how to provide email accounts for patrons without incurring the technical and administrative burden associated with them. Before free email systems like Hotmail, my answers to such questions were usually, "Find a friendly ISP". After Hotmail, everything changed. Anyone who had access to the net had an email address. The market had created something amazing; an advertising revenue-driven free service that a lot of people really, really needed. Heavily commoditized now, free email is just another feature that most sites trying to draw repeat business offer to their visitors. Site after site now offers it in exchange for personal information from the subscriber that allows the site to maximize their advertising revenue. It seemed perfect; as if the hand of god had reached down and solved a big problem that hadn't even bubbled up to "State of the Union" level yet. GOVERNMENT REGULATORS THAT GET IT It wasn't until an enlightened government regulator pointed out the danger of unwanted commercial email (spam) to the overall cost of Internet services that I realized there was a genuine danger. Christine Varney, the most net-savvy Federal Trade Commissioner ever to hold the position, first posed the question during the FTC's "Privacy Week" in 1997. During a week of informative hearings about Online Privacy, spam was one of many hot topics and she asked the question, "To what extent does spam increase the cost of Internet services for the average consumer?" And if for-pay Internet providers may be forced to increase their fees to subscribers, what will this do to free services? This started me down a road that only made me even more nervous, and confirmed the fact that someone needs to be watching this issue. Free email services are an amazing thing, and it's not clear that their existence is inevitable. In fact, it's not clear that free email, and other free services, aren't simply teetering on a precariously narrow ledge. FACTORS THAT MIGHT END FREE EMAIL SERVICES The following factors could threaten the future of free email services, which are critical to the future of Universal Email. Although not an exhaustive list, these are the issues I immediately think of with my Markle Advisor hat on. 1. Tariffing on telephone calls to ISPs In the last few years concern over high usage of the phone system by Internet users has resulted in suggestions that calls to Internet providers should carry a "per minute" charge to account for the higher usage in traffic. However it's likely that implementing such a system would drive people to spend far less time online, dampening the potential market for free email systems that thrive on lots of eyeballs seeing lots of ads. Ask yourself, how much time would you spend sending and reading email if there was the equivalent of a taxi meter running? 2. Per-packet pricing of Internet traffic Although lauded by some net.pundits as the solution to the spam problem, making the sending of email a "pay per byte" system would stifle email usage quickly. My own former non-profit, the Voters Telecommunications Watch, never focused on raising money and only on organizing citizens in the democratic process. We could never have afforded such a system. More complicated schemes, with redeemable e-postage vouchers, are simply too unrealistic to be taken seriously. 3. Unsolicited Commercial Email The costs associated with receiving and delivering email that people did not ask for and do not want (spam) continue to pose a very real cost to providers of free email and all Internet Service Providers every day. At some point the increased cost of free email facilities (which include additional bandwidth, disk space, server power, and staff) due to spam will not keep pace with advertising revenues and free email will not satisfy the basic business model smell test. It is crucial that as free email services multiply, we watch as these and other factors wax and wane to affect their market viability. I hope you'll follow the Markle Foundation's Email for All campaign with the same interest. Markle's appreciation for the important role communications technologies play in our lives is legendary, and their interest in this topic is crucial to the future of the Net as a mainstream medium. [The above essay is the opinion of Shabbir J. Safdar, and should not be construed to represent the opinion of mindshare Internet Campaigns, LLC.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Markle Foundation's E-Mail for All Universal Access Event WWW/Un/Subscribe Info: http://www.iaginteractive.com/emfa EMFA-EVENT posts may be forwarded via e-mail, for details on other uses or for general comments: emfa@publicus.net - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -